Trump’s propaganda and our American caste system

I’ve found it tough to write lately; in moments I feel both agitated and unfocused. I know anything I write has already been said—many times over—and in tighter, more clever ways. But something’s been haunting me, and I want to try to organize my thoughts and write about them. Even if they fall short of my expectations and standards. Even if they only reach a few souls. Because I’m trying to make sense of this national mess we’re in and help us find a way out.

Here’s the question that’s been popping up in the quieter moments—when I’m driving, when I’m walking in the woods, when I just close my eyes and breathe deeply: How do we reach some of the millions of Americans who’ve completely accepted Trump’s propaganda?

This is not a rhetorical question for me. I mean it most sincerely. I know we can’t hope to reach all of them; some have been completely blinded by the cult of personality that is the Trump brand. And no, I’m not talking about the Trump business enterprise with the family name garishly posted on buildings and products. I’m referring to his presidency itself, which long ago ceased to be about ideas or policy. It’s a classic case of a cult of personality. All the parts are there: relentless propaganda, big lies, government-organized demonstrations, constant flattery and praise from his underlings, stoking feelings of hatred and resentment, giving people permission to feel aggrieved and angry, and providing the public with enemies to blame for all that’s wrong in the nation. 

Needless to say, this is all grotesque. And my revulsion at this twisted cult makes me want to avert my eyes, turn away from the news stories and videos. I want to go inward and self-protect, which is a natural reaction to discomfort and disgust. But as a historian, as a teacher, and as a politician, I do feel a responsibility to keep watching and witnessing. And to share information, instruct, and make connections when I can. And to turn to others who can help guide me in this work.

Let me make something explicit: what we’re seeing now is not new. It is the inevitable outgrowth of a society built on a caste system. This Trumpian moment is (I think) the last ugly gasp of a hierarchy built over hundreds of years in this nation. But this excruciating “moment” may last for years if we don’t see it for what it is: the clash between those who want to finally dismantle our often hidden caste system and those who believe their only hope of maintaining any kind of power is in keeping the caste system intact. Thank you, Isabel Wilkerson, for giving me and thousands of other Americans the incredible gift to the nation that is your latest book, Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents. It’s so damn good. There’s a reason Oprah Winfrey sent 500 copies of the book out to our nation’s governors, mayors, CEOs and college professors. It lays bare the failure of our nation’s ideals—ideals that were written while the caste system was already in place.

I know that so many people will never willingly read a non-fiction book, no matter how emphatically I tell you that you should, so I’ll highlight a few passages from Wilkerson’s book that I hope will stay with you and give us all courage and strength. If we truly start to understand and accept that our caste system based on skin color has been built over hundreds of years, we will not lose heart so quickly when it inevitably takes so many years to dismantle it. Bottom line: The American caste system began in earnest after the arrival of the first Africans to the Virginia colony in 1619.

From Wilkerson’s book: “It is a measure of how long enslavement lasted in the United States that the year 2022 marks the first year that the United States will have been an independent nation for as long as slavery lasted on its soil.” It doesn’t matter how many times I read this sentence; it still shocks me.

Many Americans still see slavery as that “peculiar institution” that was an unfortunate, but short-lived, aspect of our nation’s past. And most have no idea of the political gains made by African-Americans during the period of Reconstruction–or how the racist “Redeemer” movement in the South put the racial caste system firmly back into place through terror, intimidation and the might of the Jim Crow laws.

Wilkerson, again: “The  institution of slavery created a crippling distortion of human relationships where people on one side were made to perform the role of subservience and to sublimate whatever innate talents or intelligence they might have….On the other side, the dominant caste lived under the illusion of an innate superiority over all other groups of humans, told themselves that the people they forced to work for up to eighteen hours, without the pay that anyone had a right to expect, were not, in fact, people, but beasts of the field, childlike creatures, not men, not women, that the performance of servility that had been flogged out of them arose from genuine respect and admiration for their innate glory.”

And then these warped relationships were passed down from generation to generation. And those in the upper caste grew used to their “unearned deference” and came to expect it and demand it. As Wilkerson points out, as they dehumanized others, they dehumanized themselves.

It is this lie—this wicked distortion of human relationships—that we, as a nation, are finally confronting. At least, some of us are. The others, those not ready to confront the lie, are the ones who are grateful for Trump’s message. He’s buying them a bit more time to live in the sick enchantment of the lie. He’s giving permission for their sense of aggrievement. He’s blatantly harkening back to a time when the caste lines were clearer. A time when a Black man couldn’t be president; a time when a woman of Indian and Jamaican descent could not be a candidate for Vice President.

His propaganda is comforting to those who don’t truly understand our nation’s fraught history, and it bolsters those who are deeply afraid (sometimes unconsciously) of losing their power, their station. But sharing power does not mean a loss of power. Inviting more people into places of power means that as a nation we might finally be able to fulfill the noble, but so far unrealized, ideals of equality and justice.

So, back to where I started. How do we reach some of the millions of Americans who’ve completely accepted Trump’s propaganda? I don’t know for certain, but I do feel a little closer to the answer after reading Wilkerson’s magnificent book. We must all start to make America’s invisible caste system more obvious, and we must honestly name the ways in which this tight system of control keeps us all smaller and more fearful. It’s a terrible way to live.

A call for unity and courage

(This is the text of the speech that I gave at the Vermont Democratic Party’s Unity Rally on Thursday, August 13th in Montpelier.)

Good morning! I stand here as the Majority Leader in the Vermont Senate. But more importantly, I stand here as a citizen. Because under our system of government, we all wield the same power in the voting booth.

Many of you remember U.S. Senator Paul Wellstone who tragically died in a plane crash in 2002. Wellstone is well known for his stirring quote: “We all do better when we all do better.” 

But there’s another Wellstone quote that’s become my personal motto: “This is no time for timidity.” 

This line focuses my attention and my commitment as I reflect upon the excruciating years of the Trump presidency. We’ve witnessed terrific dysfunction and a tremendous meanness of spirit and strategy.   

This is no time for timidity

This line guides me as I contemplate the horrible twists and turns sure to come in this election. And it helps me to stave off feelings of doom and paralysis. It points me towards usefulness and away from feeling useless, and it awakens a hopefulness that fitfully slumbers.

This is no time for timidity

To counteract creeping despondency, my brother-in-law has decided to focus his energy since Trump’s ascendancy. Fighting racism in America has become his most important issue, and he’s spending his time and money to get more people of color elected to higher office. He’s backing a Democratic congressional candidate in his home district and following many other House races across the country. 

A former coach, he’s not content to merely watch the court from the sidelines. He’s become absolutely FULLY engaged in the process of changing the face of politics in this country.

He believes, as I do, that we all have a part to play in the great struggle for a more just, a more gentle world. And as we head into the general election, I’ll plan my concrete actions to bring about that change. We all must do the same.

How will we each become more fully engaged in transforming the world? What can we each bring to this all-important task? Will you offer a sharp mind? Time? A meeting space? Money? Communication skills? Energy and positivity? Fierce loyalty or compassion?

Are you a connector? An excellent researcher? Are you an artist? A performer? A great organizer of people? Do you move people with your music, your art, your words? Do you have a big heart that’s searching for a landing place? Or do you have a healthy skepticism that can coax us all towards greatness?

My call to action is expansive, inclusive, and absolutely urgent. It’s well past time for all of us to put down our insecurities; they are serving no good master. Push yourself beyond simply caring (and worrying); it’s time to do. 

I know “the doing” feels pointless at times. The world is immense and complicated and often feels like a great mess. What impact do our relatively small actions truly have on anything at all? 

But maybe this is actually the wrong question—the wrong frame entirely—for understanding our predicament.

The actions themselves, regardless of grand outcomes, are the point. The process of meaning-making—of crafting culture and creating connections— THAT is the heart of it all. 

We’re all living through a deeply troubling time in history, and many of us feel trapped in someone else’s narrative. But the meaning-makers, the history shapers, are not the people at the top. It’s all of us as citizens– engaged, powerful citizens.  As a historian, I know this to be true. 

The sycophants—and the “yes” men and women—grab the headlines. But historians will look to the rest of us and our response to the insanity. 

This is no time for timidity. Or for acrimony among us.

Not because we can’t have legitimate points of disagreement. But because this horrible moment in time is not just about us. It’s about our children and the generations that come after who will want to know: What did you do to fight the darkness? 

In search of equilibrium

For those of you who’ve never ridden a motorcycle, the thing that keeps you upright is–just like on a bicycle–forward motion. The big difference, of course, is that bicycles don’t weigh hundreds of pounds. My little Honda Rebel weighs just over 300 lbs., which is really pretty light for a motorcycle but doesn’t feel light at all to this small gal. Sometimes I feel like the “Mouse on the Motorcycle” from the old Beverly Cleary children’s books.

When I ride my bike regularly, I get a really good workout for my ab muscles because I need to balance that 300 lbs. whenever I stop at a stop sign or red light or when I’m pushing it out of my garage to get it ready to ride. Sometimes one small change in incline, or an unexpected slippery surface, can cause the bike to overbalance in one direction or another. In those anxious moments, I have a split second to determine if I can muscle it back up to equilibrium or whether I need to admit defeat and try to leap out of the way before it falls on me.

Yesterday on a lovely ride on the back roads of southern Vermont, I came to a stop sign, and a pickup truck pulled up way too closely behind me. I felt pressured to move quickly, and in my haste, I stalled out the bike. I felt my motorcycle start to list to the left, and I had to concentrate all my strength and attention on muscling it back up to stability. I was successful, and I let out a deep “Whew!” I then waved the truck around me so I could take a few more moments to collect myself. As I revved the engine and started for home, I realized that this experience was a good metaphor for how I’ve felt the past few weeks: out of equilibrium. No matter how much I tried to get myself back in balance, I just seemed to careen further into disequilibrium. 

When I feel this way it usually means that I’m living part of my life out of sync with my values. It sounds pretty straightforward. Figure out where some action or thought is out of alignment with my values, and then, well…just STOP doing that thing, or saying that thing, or thinking that thing. Simple! Except that sometimes our values collide or at least bump up against each other. Which value to honor in those moments? Different situations obviously call on different values, but it isn’t always easy to sort out which value to turn the spotlight on and which to leave in the shadows.

These past few weeks I’ve struggled with frustration, anger and disillusionment. Someone really disappointed me, and this sent me spinning out of balance. I guess the more honest thing to say is that I let it send me out of whack. It made me so irritated and indignant that it impacted my ability to focus on my work or quiet my mind. There were critical moments when I chose to value the qualities of candor, integrity, and authenticity over the principles of kindness and understanding. I stood squarely in righteousness but lost sight of the fact that part of decency is compassion. And I forgot that belittling statements don’t just harm the subject of the backbiting; they always make me feel smaller.

How did I know that it was time for deeper reflection and course correction? I started to journal about my complicated feelings. I am not a big journaler, so when I reach for my planner in order to spill my thoughts and emotions out, well, I know that I am feeling out of balance.

As many of you know, after being a teacher and before I ran for office, I was trained as a personal coach. One of the tenents of my particular style of coaching is: That which you can’t be with will ride you.  What that means is that if there is something that’s irking you about someone else, there is probably some part of that quality that’s highlighting your own shortcomings. That which you can’t be with will ride you.

I journaled about my insecurities, my shortcomings, and my own flaws. I then shared this information with a few trusted friends and advisers. They witnessed and acknowledged my feelings and thoughts. I then asked them to make a promise to me that they’d reflect back to me—gently but firmly—when I’m straying from my values. Essentially, I asked them to bring me back to equilibrium.

This pandemic is contributing to most of us feeling out of balance. Now is a good time to identify what are the few components of your disequilibrium that you can actually can control. Then identify a prompt, a signal, that will indicate to you that you’re not in line with your values. It doesn’t have to be a 300 lbs. motorcycle.

Image by Wallingford resident Maria French at 2eyeswalking.com

Seeing differently

On our vacation in South Hero several weeks ago, we’d spend most evenings on the deck playing Pictionary. We shared many laughs—and some arguments—as we drew quick sketches to elicit guesses from our teammates. We’d played this game on several other occasions with some success, but this was the first time I noticed the way in which my son built his drawings. This simple observation has given me unexpected insight into how he, as someone on the autism spectrum, interprets his world.

It was his turn to draw. His task was to sketch a kitchen spatula. (Not the rubbery kind used to scrape bowls, but the stiff kind used to flip pancakes. I have since learned that some folks call this a “turner.” But in my house we call it a spatula.) He started his picture by drawing a tiny circle to indicate the hole in the handle by which it can be hung by a hook. Around the hole, he drew a handle. Next came the flat head. He said to me, “Hold on. Wait for it.” Then he carefully drew the slats. I yelled, “Spatula!” as he drew the last slat. 

It was rather an unremarkable moment, and it would’ve been so easy for me to miss the importance. I’m certain I’m given other opportunities for insight into my son each day and miss them. Perhaps because I’m distracted. Maybe because I’m harried or impatient. Or it could be that I simply have a difficult time understanding and accepting that he views the world quite differently.

I keep thinking about how he revealed his drawing bit by bit. He built the entire drawing starting from a small hole in the handle. I know I never would have started my own drawing in that way. This is an important reminder to me that people on the Autism Spectrum view the world and process information differently than neurotypical folks. I’ve read excerpts from some of Temple Grandin’s books and have heard her speak about what it’s like to “think in pictures.” But until I saw my son’s sketches this information never fully landed.

Since the spatula drawing, I’ve learned about a study that tracked the eye movements of people as they looked at hundreds of different images. Half of the participants were officially diagnosed as being on the autism spectrum; the other half were “neurotypical.” 

Previous research has shown that people on the spectrum typically don’t look at faces closely, can be overwhelmed by too much stimuli, and have a tendency to fixate intensely on one image or idea at a time. But this study, published in 2017, helps us to actually see the world how many people on the autism spectrum might.

Co-author Ralph Adolphs, a neuroscientist at CalTech, said about the research, “Among other findings, our work shows that the story is not as simple as saying ‘people with ASD don’t look normally at faces.’ They don’t look at most things in a typical way.” 

You can view the images yourself in this article as they appeared in Business Insider Australia: http://www.businessinsider.com.au/how-autistic-people-see-the-world-2015-10-/amp The images show what participants’ eyes gravitated toward. People with autism tended to focus on the center of each of the images, even when other relevant objects or people were visible. They also looked at the edges of objects and patterns in the images rather than the faces that “neurotypical” participants focused on.

What a revelation this has been for me! That which I accept as being the most important information my eyes and brain take in each moment are almost certainly not the same things that my son sorts as important and worthy of his attention. I wish I’d learned this years ago. I would’ve parented quite differently. I would have understood him so much better. It’s difficult to let go of this heartache, but I’m so grateful for the insight given to me by his spatula drawing.

If we zoom out from this particular topic and consider this idea in a more expansive way, what frustrations do you harbor because someone in your family does not see things quite the same way as you do? How does this play out in your work life? How can you use this new information about autism to be more understanding and more forgiving of those who see something differently? I’ve found it to be a very useful prompt for me to help me consider other perspectives and to truly accept that my view is usually not the only way to look at something.